Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Writing & Authentic Audiences

In researching the effects authentic audiences have on students, I found a paper written back when I was in middle school by Gayle Allen and Ann Thompson on the effects of computer assisted collaboration on writing (Allen & Thompson, 1994). Back then the computer assisted collaboration was emailing students papers to mentor college students and the college students emailing back their comments. While it is not the Google Docs, Adobe Buzzword, or wikis of today, it was collaborative and did provide students with an audience beyond their teacher.

The study compared the students in the experimental group, those that sent their work via email to the college students, to students in the control group, those who papers were read and commented on only by their teachers (Allen & Thompson, 1994). The report found that students in the experimental group wrote more and received higher markers than those in the control group (Allen & Thompson, 1994). When the results were looked at by gender, the study found that men in the experimental group preform significantly better the control group when comparing the holistic writing scores (Allen & Thompson, 1994). There was no statistical difference in the holistic writing score for females between the control and experimental groups (Allen & Thompson, 1994). However, the study found that females who previously did not utilize the computer in the classroom where comfortable with computer when it was introduced in a supportive, learning environment(Allen & Thompson, 1994).

The paper concludes with the thoughts that the collaborative writing environment can enrich the classroom writing environment and promote writing as a social interaction and cognitive process (Allen & Thompson, 1994).

While the tools may have evolve, this study shows that authentic audiences positively effect students' writing. I would like to think that this would transfer across subject matters and disciplines. I will continue to look for more research on the subject (in fact, I have a few tweeters helping me look for research right now).

References:

Allen, G. and Thompson, A. (1994). Proceedings from The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 4-8, 1994): Analysis of the Effect of Networking on Computer-Assisted Collaborative Writing in a Fifth Grade Classroom. Retrieved March 22, 2009 from ERIC database.

2 comments:

  1. I have found in my own classroom, that when students work collaboratively and engage in peer review they develop their own voice much easier than when I am the one reviewing. When I was in school, we didn't have computers and although the pedagogy supported group work, collaboration was the exception rather than the rule. I sometimes marvel at how different the classroom of today is from 30+ years ago. Our students are so fortunate that we have all these tools and resources availabe to help us create more effective instruction.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Piggy-backing on your post, I was just reading an article today about the benefits of blogging, and it stated that blogging provides students with an authentic audience. The article went on to explain that students who blog "write more, write in greater detail, and take greater care with spelling, grammar, and punctuation when they are writing for an authentic audience in the Internet". Here's the link in case you want to read it: http://www.education-world.com/a_tech/tech/tech217.shtml

    ReplyDelete